A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Friday 13 March 2015

Cambodia, the EU and their forests

Bantengs, a wild cattle, forage in the jungle in Mondulkiri province in December 2010
Bantengs, a wild cattle, forage in the jungle in Mondulkiri province in December 2010. Cambodian forests form part of the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot, home to more than 2,000 plant species, 500 birds, 10 mammals and 80 fish. AFP/WWF
Cambodia hosts varied and extensive forests covering more than 10.8 million hectares representing 57 per cent of the country’s surface, which includes on one side, the natural forests estimated to 35 per cent of the country’s surface and containing biologically unique landscapes and areas of significant cultural heritage, and on the other side, plantation forests (such as rubber trees) that are potentially very productive.
The majority of Cambodia’s rural population are subsistence farmers. Seventy-five per cent of these depend on access to natural forest resources for essential products such as energy and food, particularly in times of hardship. Forests also provide household opportunities for diversification, supplementary income and employment created by forest-product-based enterprises.
While forests have substantially provided the basis for rural livelihoods, they have also been a source of conflict and exploitation. As a result, over the past four decades forest cover has decreased by 14 per cent. Some experts estimate that Cambodia has lost more than a quarter of its remaining primary forests since 2000. Today Cambodia is facing a challenging task to achieve a balance between economic development and broader community benefits from forests and environmental protection, which cannot be ignored.
In the European Union, forests cover 176 million hectares. This means more than 42 per cent of EU land area is covered with forest. This cover varies across countries from 12 per cent in the United Kingdom and 36 per cent in France to 76 per cent in Sweden and 74 per cent in Finland, for example.

The European forest cover has evolved over time. Since the times of the Romans, forests were cleared to grow crops and raise livestock. From the Middle Ages until 1900, wide expanses of the old forests were cut and timber was used for many purposes: fuel wood, metal production, furniture, ship and house construction. In the early 20th century, natural forests had dramatically declined in Europe. After World War II, many countries started massive afforestation programs that are still running today. In parallel to these afforestation programs, cropland decreased due to technological innovations such as motorisation, better drainage and irrigation systems: less land is now needed to produce the same amount of food. Populations have also migrated from rural areas to cities and are more concentrated. As a result of these technological innovations, social trends and of the sustainable management of its forests, Europe’s forests grew by a third over the past 100 years. In the southern French region of Vaucluse for example, entire mountain ranges were de-forested at the beginning of the 20th century, but the country invested heavily to reverse the trend and today a rich forest has grown.
Natural forests and biodiversity are central to all life forms. The richer the diversity of life, the greater the opportunity for medical discoveries, economic development and adaptive responses to such new challenges as climate change. The first assessment of European biodiversity from 2009 has shown that at least 65 per cent of habitats and 52 per cent of species of European importance are at risk of extinction. Although the European Union has made progress towards the internationally agreed conservation targets, it remains a challenge and a significant financial cost to restore the past levels of biodiversity.
With this experience in mind, the European Union has engaged actively at the global level in the fight against illegal logging and in the protection of biodiversity. For the protection of forests, the EU has two tools to ensure that timber imported to Europe is produced legally and from sustainably: the Timber Regulation, which controls timber that is imported in the EU, and the Forestry Law Enforcement and Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan, which supports timber-producing countries to export legal timber. On the other hand, with its Biodiversity Strategy, the EU aims to halt the loss of biodiversity in the EU by 2020, and to restore it in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss.
Cambodia is blessed with a very rich biodiversity, and forms part of the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. It is home to more than 2,000 known plant species, 500 birds, 100 mammals and 800 fish. Natural forests are the habitat for approximately 33 per cent of the threatened species in Cambodia. This capital is priceless and should be preserved. It does not exist in forest plantations where monoculture approach transforms those areas in “green deserts” with a severe lack of biodiversity.
The European Union is committed to working with Cambodia in the management of its natural resources and in parallel to adapting to climate change. We already work very closely with the government and with local communities in protecting Cambodian natural forests. In November last year, the European Union decided to commit an additional €149 million ($162 million) until 2020 for the management of natural resources in Cambodia. We do agree with Cambodians, both officials and civil society, that it is important for such forest-rich countries as Cambodia to learn from Europe’s experiences to manage sustainably its existing resources and not to lose decades replanting its forests.
Jean-François Cautain is the European Union’s ambassador to Cambodia.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Begin of Drgunzet's comment.

I found out the good Vietnamese people have been planting massive, thousand and thousand of hecta mangrove forest. They advanced the shore line of the fertile Mekong delta (Khmer Krom) toward the sea at the rate of 100 meter per year.

That's what I read in the articles. So, I used the Google earth's satellite image to see the extent of their work.

It's amazing. For hundreds and hundreds miles long, I see the mangrove forest taking hold in the sea. From the satellite image, I can a pattern:

_ The mangrove near the land is greener, thicker. It's fully developed and thick.

_ The mangrove near the ocean is grayish, thinner. It's newer and needs more time to grow thick.

-----------------------------
I scanned the satellite image along the coast line all the ways to Cambodia. I noticed the Cambodian coast line had zero planting mangrove a long the coast. The Cambodian mangrove forest is narrow and thick. This mean the ocean has been continuing to erode the edge of the old mangrove forest.

The Cambodians are useless, not taking care of their mangrove forest.

---------------------------
During the Vietnam war, the American sprayed Agent Orange to devastate the mangrove forest Con Gio hide-out. The American scientists concluded, "Nature will need at least 100 years to recover this [Con Gio] devastation.

But the Vietnamese worked so hard, they replanted the large Con Gio area, the area twice as big as Phnom Penh. After 30 years effort, the mangrove forest returned to its natural and prime condition. This effort was hailed by many International Nature groups.

So, clearly the Vietnamese are superior to the Khmer. Mekong delta is much better off to be Vietnamese land. From my research, the Khmer race wiped out an advanced civilization, the Funan who inhabited the super fertile Mekong delta. The whole area was left uninhabited. Even the Chams could sneaked a navy up along the Mekong river to attack Khmer capital.

Now you see how the Vietnamese developed the waste land into a super fertile and productive land, you want to take it over. You are greedy and useless.

-Drgunzet-