A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Saturday 17 March 2012

Poor Leadership Threatens Cambodia’s Survival: Professor [Naranhkiri Tith]

Photo: by Poch Reasey, VOA Khmer: “These leaders, I am not saying they are worse than Hun Sen, but they are not that good,” Naranhkiri Tith said.

Friday, 16 March 2012
Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer | Washington, DC

“To cry wolf” or to appear racist against the Vietnamese is to lose international support."

Cambodia suffers from poor leadership, with poor prospects not just in the ruling party, but among opposition leaders, a former Cambodian professor in the US says.

South Africa had Nelson Mandela, Burma has Aung San Suu Kyi, but Cambodia has “Class Z” leaders like Prime Minister Hun Sen, said Naranhkiri Tith, a former professor at Johns Hopkins University.

“Where on Earth can a country like that survive?” he said.

The country also lacks strong leadership amongst its opposition, said Naranhkiri Tith, who fled the country in the 1960s and settled in the US.

Sam Rainsy, the main opposition leader, is in exile and faces more than 10 years of imprisonment over charges related to the destruction of markers near the Vietnamese border in Svay Rieng province.

Naranhkiri Tith said Sam Rainsy had incited people against the Vietnamese “the cheap way” and would not be able to compete with the ruling party and Hun Sen without more struggle.

“These leaders, I am not saying they are worse than Hun Sen, but they are not that good,” he said. “Cambodians need the quality of Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, who have great moral strength.”

Sam Rainsy declined to comment, but he has said in the past he has been forced to lead the opposition from abroad. He has said he was protecting Cambodian land from Vietnamese encroachment.

Kem Sokha, head of the minority opposition Human Rights Party, who is touring Australia to find support for his party, said he distrusted the main opposition and so had created his own party.

“If we have only politicians and leaders who incite people and run away, we see it is impossible to solve problems,” he said. “Today, the ruling party knows how to frighten people, and Sam Rainsy alarms people, but the Human Rights Party makes people understand and feel warm, in order to take victory in changing the dictatorial leaders.”

Government spokesman Phay Siphan told VOA Khmer the administration was gradually resolving the country’s most important problems with human rights and democracy, but its main focus is on peace.

“This is the very highest value for the Cambodian nation,” he said. The government “is establishing Cambodia as independent and neutral and not receiving sanctions from China or the West or neighboring countries.”

Meanwhile, Ou Virak, head of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights, said Cambodian politics have not developed but that could change in the next generation.

Political infighting now is about individuals, he said, not social or political policies for national problems.

Hun Sen, who has held power for three decades, has not had a real political rival. The Sam Rainsy Party has slowly grown its influence and now holds 26 of 123 National Assembly seats. The Human Rights Party has three seats. The ruling Cambodian People’s Party has 90 seats.

Naranhkiri Tith said the leadership of Suu Kyi and Mandela could serve as a good example for Cambodians.

While acknowledging Vietnamese influence as a threat to the country’s national security, he said violence should be avoided. “To cry wolf” or to appear racist against the Vietnamese is to lose international support, he said.

“So we should concentrate on trying to fight for our freedom inside the country, to protect human rights, to protect liberty, to protect freedom, to protect our land and our people, without referring to the Vietnamese,” he said. “That’s what all the leaders should do.”

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is Naranhkiri Tit a youn ?

Anonymous said...

Good advice from Prof. Naranhkiri Tith not to use race as a political point-scoring. As politicians, they should be mature enough to fight for justice, better economy, better health, better ling standard or about sovereignty and territorial integrity, rather than use race issue to make their points.

Having said that, I think Prof. Naranhkiri Tith is not an angel either when it comes to attacking the Viet to make his points. I've read him talking about Cambodia as an "endangered race" in which he referred to threats from the Viet and Thais. He did similar things when he talked about Cambodia's border issues with its neighbors. This is political point-scoring using the race cards to make one's own points. I think Prof. Naranhkiri Tith must lead by example by practicing what he had preached.

Anonymous said...

Your mum is a YOUN. She taught you only one word to win an argument because she didn't finish her education

Anonymous said...

1:23 PM
You just don't know the different between privacy with society feeling. This kind of behavior, will not help our country Cambodia.

Anonymous said...

Is it necessary caling people names here? Let's us be just a little civilized here and have some standard like civiliized people do. I agree with prof. Naranhkiri perspective. If we all look at our current day map that we loss our land to our neiboring countries like Vietnam and Thai piece by piece since the fall of Angkor Wat erra. Ever since the Cambodian never have decent leader(s). Let's ask ourselves, after the fall of Angkor Wat and under the directions of Norodom's Sihanok were there any progress made in terms of producing patriot leaders? Cambodia has lack behind the rest of the world in all areas. In my opinion, in order for Cambodia to emerge from the erra of darkness, the first thing she need is to educate of her people, be less dependable of foreign help, improve in science, technology, economic and politics. These four components are vital for Cambodians to be success. During the Angkorian erra, the Khmers were known to be the master of agriculture and trades but lack in science and technology. If we can achieve in all these four components then we can take back our motherland to honor our forefather.

Anonymous said...

Before we can take back the land, are we even sure that we can keep our current land? Let's not forget our land is being sold in pieces to foreigners. Here is where the country is heading, and you can take my word 10 years from now -- all SEA, the fair skinned Chinese and Khmer mixed will rule this country. All pure Khmers will be slaves in their own country. We're already seeing them get kicked out of their land... wait and see folks. The Viets want to swallow Cambodia, but they're blocked by China. So they're out of luck.

Anonymous said...

Prof. Naranhkiri Tith is simply out of his mind and reality.
Look at immigration. How many Viets in Cambodia?
-Look at justice in judicial system? Do't you see the case of factory workers been shoot by district governer in Svay Reang?
-Justice in economics? How many poor Khmers end up as slaves and been killed so far on Thai borders and in Malaysia?
-Freedom and expression?
- Border issue is admitted by the strong man ,Hun, that it was wrong,but it is still kept in the grey affair.

How can you say Sam Rainsy is weak? He has done his best.Cambodia is ruled by a violent gangster and his clans. Sam Rainsy is right to protect his life and he is still managing his party full time and save.He was almost been kill once by Hun's assassin don't you remember?

Sam Rainsy is one of our best hope.Please give him some credit.

True Khmer